Consequences of Ischemic Preconditioning of Kidney: Comparing between Male and Female Rats

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Abhar School of Nursing, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Abhar, Zanjan, Iran

2 Physioloy Research Centre and Physiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Anatomy and Neuroscience Department, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Objective(s)
Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a leading cause of kidney transplantation failure, and ischemic-preconditioning (IPC) is a protective method against the IRI. In the present study, the defensive effect of IPC on rats’ kidney was investigated and more importantly the differences between two genders were appraised.
Materials and Methods
Thirty two Wistar rats were randomly allocated to four groups: group A (8 male IR), B (8 female IR), C (8 male IPC) and D (8 female IPC). Ischemia was induced by clamping of left renal arteries for 45 min in groups A and B. Rats in groups C and D experienced four cycles of 4 min arterial clamping followed by 11 min of de-clamping prior to the final 45 min of ischemia. 24 hr later, serum was provided to assess the blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine values. Also, renal tissues were obtained for histological measurements.
Results
Induction of IPC in both male and female rats led to significant decrease in creatinine levels in comparison with sham groups (P<0.01). The same results were seen in BUN levels (P<0.01). However, there were no significant difference between two genders. Besides, histological protective effects of IPC was proved especially in female rats (P<0.01).
Conclusion
Findings of our study confirmed that renal IPC reduces the damages in both genders especially females. Thus, the IPC procedure seems to be a useful method mainly in females.

Keywords


1. Kelsey R. Acute kidney injury: Ischaemic preconditioning for preventing contrast-induced AKI. Nat Rev Nephrol 2012; 8:492.
2. Zhao JL, Yang YJ, Cui CJ, You SJ, Gao RL. Pretreatment with simvastatin reduces myocardial no-reflow by opening mitochondrial K (ATP) channel. Br J Pharmacol 2006; 149:243-249.
3. Perico N, Cattaneo D, Sayegh MH, Remuzzi G. Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation. Lancet 2004; 364:1814-1827.
4. Yokota N, O’Donnell M, Daniels F. Protective effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor on experimental renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Nephrol 2003; 23:13-17.
5. Bonventre JV. Kidney ischemic preconditioning. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2002; 11:43-48.
6. Neugarten J, Acharya A, Silbiger SR. Effect of gender on the progression of nondiabetic renal disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11:319-329.
7. Torras J, Herrero-Fresneda I, Lioberas N, Riera M, Ma-Cruzado J, Ma-Grinyo J. Promising effects of ischemic preconditioning in renal transplantation. Kidney Int 2002; 61:2218-2227.
8. Muller V, Losonczy G, Heemann U, Vannay A, Fekete A, Reusz G. Sexual dimorphism in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats: Possible role of endothelin. Kidney Int 2002; 62:1364-1371.
9. Pitcher JM, Wang M, Tsai BM, Kher A, Turrentine MW, Brown JW, Meldrum DR. Preconditioning: Gender Effects. J Surg Res 2005; 129:202-220.
10. Song X, Li G, Vaage J, Valen G. Effects of sex, gonadectomy, and oestrogen substitution on ischemic preconditioning and ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice. Acta Physiol Scand 2003; 177:459-466. 11. Kocsis GF, Sárközy M, Bencsik P, Pipicz M, Varga ZV, Paloczi J, et al. Preconditioning protects the heart in a prolonged uremic condition. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2012 [Epub ahead of print]. 12. Li Z, Jin ZQ. Ischemic preconditioning enhances integrity of coronary endothelial tight junctions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012; 425:630-635. 13. Rehni AK, Singh TG. Involvement of CCR-2 chemokine receptor activation in ischemic preconditioning and postconditioning of brain in mice. Cytokine 2012; 60:83-89. 14. Gasbarrini A, Addolorato G, Di Campli C, Simoncini M, Montemagno S, Castagneto M, et al. Gender affects reperfusion injury in rat liver. Dig Dis Sci 2001; 46: 1305-1312.
15. Silbiger S, Neugarten J. Gender and human chronic renal disease. Gend Med 2008; 5:3-10.
16. Kher A, Meldrum KK, Wang M, Tsai BM, Pitcher JM, Meldrum DR. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of sex differences in renal ischemia–reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res 2005; 67:594-603.
17. Kadkhodaee M, Aryamanesh S, Faghihi M, Zahmatkesh M. Protection of rat renal vitamin E levels by ischemic-preconditioning. BMC Nephrol 2004; 5:6-13.