Preparation and characterization of celecoxib solid dispersions; comparison of poloxamer-188 and PVP-K30 as carriers

Introduction

Celecoxib (CLX) is a selective cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitor that has been widely used in the treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and acute pain. In addition, several studies have shown the therapeutic benefits of co-administration of CLX and chemotropic agents in cancer treatment protocols (1, 2). According to the biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS), CLX can be categorized as class II drugs (poor water-solubility and high gastrointestinal permeability). In this class, dissolution is the rate limiting step for absorption from the gastrointestinal tract (3). Low solubility of CLX (~5 µg/ml) results in incomplete and high variability in absorption after oral administration (1,

4). Hence, increasing the solubility and dissolution rate is the most efficient strategy to improve oral bioavailability of this drug. Moreover, CLX with the needle shape crystals shows undesirable properties like cohesiveness, poor flowability and handling problems (5) which could cause some problems during the production of its dosage forms.

Various formulations have been used to overcome these drawbacks. Among the several formulation strategies, solid dispersion systems have been widely used to improve the dissolution and oral bioavailability of poorly water soluble drugs. Solid dispersion is a solid state in which the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) could be dispersed  

particularly or molecularly in an inert amorphous or crystalline carrier. In these systems, reduction in drug particle size (sometimes to the molecular level), and conversion of the crystalline structure of API to the amorphous state, could lead to enhancement of the dissolution rate and oral bioavailability of poorly water soluble drugs (6). In addition, the use of hydrophilic carriers like polyethylene glycols, PVPs, PLXs, etc. in solid dispersion systems could improve the wettability of hydrophobic drugs.

PVPs have suitable solubility in water and therefore could be used as hydrophilic carriers in solid dispersion systems (7). These polymers are also good candidates for preparation of solid dispersion systems using solvent evaporation method due to their good solubility in most of the solvents. PVP-K30 has been used in various solid dispersion formulations in order to enhance the solubility and dissolution rate of poorly water soluble drugs (8, 9). Andrews et al prepared solid dispersion of CLX and PVP-K30 and showed that PVP could improve the dissolution of CLX (5). Furthermore, PVP-K30 with high T_g value around 154°C could prevent mobilization and recrystalli-zation of drug following long time storage and improve amorphous state stability of drugs (5). PLX-188 is nonionic surfactant and a block copolymer composed of polyoxyethylene and polypropylene blocks which has been widely used as wetting and solubilizing agent. PLX-188 could be used in preparation  of solid dispersion systems using melting process due to its low melting point (56-57°C) and it has been shown  that the solubility and dissolution rate of poorly water soluble drugs have been improved using PLX-188 in solid dispersions (10, 11). However there is no report about the use of this carrier in preparation of solid dispersion of CLX. This study has been performed to evaluate the PLX as carrier in preparation of solid dispersion systems of CLX and to compare the PVP-K30 and PLX in terms of their effect on dissolution profile.

 Materials and Methods

Materials

CLX was purchased from Arastoo chemical company (Iran), PVP-K30 and PLX-188 (Lutrol F68) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany) and sodium dodecyl sulfate was obtained from Merck (Germany). All other solvents and chemicals were of analytical grade.

 Preparation of solid dispersions

Solid dispersions of CLX:PVP or CLX:PLX-188 were prepared  at drug:carrier ratios of 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:4 or 1:6. For PVP, solvent evaporation method and for PLX, melting method was used.

 Solvent evaporation method

Certain amounts of CLX and PVP-K30 were
dissolved in the minimum amount of methanol to obtain clear viscose solution. The solvent was removed at 40°C in oven until complete drying of solid dispersions systems. The solid dispersions were then pulverized using a mortar and pestle, passed through 60-mesh sieve (250 µm) and stored in a desiccator until use for further studies.

 Melting method

The required amounts of CLX and PLX were blended in a beaker and immersed in a boiling water bath to allow PLX to melt. The molten mixtures were stirred continuously and after 5 min, were rapidly quench cooled in an ice bath. The dispersions were then stored for an hour in refrigerator and then pulverized using a mortar and pestle, passed through 60-mesh sieve (250 µm) and stored in a desiccator until use for further studies.

 Preparation of physical mixtures of drug/carrier

The physical mixtures of CLX and carriers were prepared by mixing the sieved fractions (less than 250 µm) of drug and carrier at the same ratio of solid dispersion systems using mortar and pestle.

 Preparation of amorphous CLX

Amorphous CLX was prepared by melting the pure CLX at 170°C under nitrogen atmosphere and then rapidly cooling in an ice bath as previously described (5). The prepared amorphous CLX was used for DSC analysis.

 Solid dispersion characterization

Determination of saturation solubility

The saturation solubility studies were performed on pure CLX, physical mixtures and solid dispersion samples. Sample of 5 mg was added to 25 ml volumetric flasks containing double-distilled water and stirred at 100 rpm in an air bath at 25°C for 48 h. The resulting suspension was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter. Concentration of CLX was determined spectrophotometrically at 253 nm. The solubility of each sample was determined in triplicates and the mean value and standard deviations were reported.

 Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)

DSC analyses were conducted using a DSC 822e Mettler-Toledo (Mettler Toledo, Switzerland) equipped with a refrigerated cooling system and calibrated using indium standard. Samples of pure CLX, solid dispersions and physical mixtures (3–5 mg) were placed in aluminum pans that were sealed with a lid. The crimped aluminum pans were heated from 20 to 200°C at a scanning rate of 10°C/min. Nitrogen was used as atmosphere at a flow rate of 80 ml/min. Onset temperatures and melting points of the samples were automatically calculated using STARe Ver. 10.00 (Mettler Toledo, Switzerland).

Table 1. Dissolution efficiency (DE), mean dissolution time (MDT) and saturation solubility for pure celecoxib (CLX) and CLX: PVP samples

 Gordon-Taylor calculations

The Gordon-Taylor equation shown below, was used to predict the theoretical T_gmix of binary solid dispersion samples of CLX:PVP. These values were compared to the experimentally determined T_g. 

T_g1 and T_g2 are the glass transition temperatures, and w₁ and w₂ are the weight fractions of the two components. K is estimated from the true density (ρ) and T_g of pure CLX and PVP. The true densities of PVP and amorphous CLX were determined to be 1.18 and 1.35g/cm³, respectively. This study was only performed on CLX:PVP solid dispersion samples.  The T_g of binary mixtures of CLX:PLX could not be detected in DSC experiments and in addition, the melting point of PLX is much lower than T_g of CLX.

 X-ray powder diffraction studies (XRPD)

X-Ray powder diffraction patterns were obtained for selected samples using a Bruker, D8 Advance, Germany diffractometer, with Cu Kα radiation. X-ray diffraction data were collected in the range of 5°-40° (2q) with 0.05 steps.

 Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR)

The FT-IR spectra of selected samples were obtained using a Perkin Elmer spectrum BX FTIR (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). Samples were previously prepared with potassium bromide (KBr), at 1:5 (sample:KBr) weight ratio. The KBr discs were prepared by compressing the powders at a pressure of 7 tones for 2 min in a hydraulic press and scanned against a blank KBr disk at wave numbers ranging from 4000 to 450 cm^-1 with resolution of 1.0 cm^-1.

 Dissolution studies

Dissolution studies were carried out in an automated dissolution tester (Pharmatest, PTWS 3E, Germany) using the USP Apparatus 2 (paddle) method. The bath temperature and paddle speed were set at 37°C and 50 rpm, respectively. Dissolution medium was 1 liter of distilled water
Table 2. Dissolution efficiency (DE), mean dissolution time (MDT) and saturation solubility for pure celecoxib (CLX) and CLX:poloxamer (PLX) samples

containing 0.25% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SLS). A certain weight of samples equivalent to 40 mg CLX was added directly to the vessels. Samples were taken from the vessels through sintered filter by a peristaltic pump (Alitea, Sweden), and assayed at 253 nm by a multi-cell transport spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Japan) based on calibration curve obtained for CLX at this wavelength. The dissolution of each sample was determined in triplicate.

 Dissolution parameters

The dissolution efficiency (DE) is defined as the area under the dissolution curve (y) up to a certain time t and expressed as a percentage of the area of the rectangle described by 100% dissolution at the same time (12).

Another parameter that describes the rate of dissolution is the mean dissolution time (MDT). MDT is calculated using the following equations.

 Where t_i¯is the midpoint of the time period during which the fraction DM of the drug has been released from sample (13).

Results

Saturation solubility of CLX

Table 1 and 2 show the saturation solubility of pure CLX, and CLX in physical mixture or solid dispersion samples. The results of the solubility studies indicated that pure CLX has very low solubility in water at 25°C (2±0.73 µg/ml). As it is shown in Table 1 and 2, the saturation solubility of CLX was increased by the presence of PVP-K30 and PLX-188 in physical mixtures and solid dispersion samples. By increasing the concentration of the carrier in the physical mixtures and solid dispersion samples the saturation solubility of CLX was also increased.

CLX: Celecoxib, PLX: Poloxamer 188; PVP: Polyvinylpyrrolidone K30

 Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)

Figure 1 shows the DSC traces of pure CLX in crystalline and amorphous states, physical mixture (PM), and solid dispersion (SD) systems with PVP-K30 and PLX-188. As it is shown in Figure 1(A) pure CLX exhibited a sharp endothermic peak at 165.51°C whilst the amorphous CLX showed T_g at 59.94°C, a recrystallization exotherm at 72.31°C and a sharp melting endotherm at 165.17°C.  Physical mixture of CLX:PVP at the ratio of 1:1 (expanded view) showed a broad melting peak with onset temperature  and
endothermic peak at 149.12°C and 161.02°C,  respectively. However, in the thermogram of SD sample with PVP a broad endothermic peak appeared at 125°C which was the Tg of the SD sample and the peak related to melting point of drug was not observed.

Figure 1B exhibits a sharp endothermic melting peak for PLX-188 at 53.49°C. This Figure also shows the absence of CLX melting endothermic peak for PM and SD samples.

 X-ray powder diffraction studies (XRPD)

XRPD pattern for CLX and its solid dispersions with PVP-K30 and PLX-188 are shown in Figures 2 and 3.  X-ray diffraction of CLX showed sharp peaks at 2θ values of 5°, 10.5°, 16° and 21.5°. PVP showed completely amorphous state with the absence of any diffraction peaks whilst PLX-188 showed two peaks at 19° and 23°. As it is shown in Figure 2, there are no peaks for all solid dispersion samples of drug and PVP-K30.

In solid dispersion samples of drug and PLX-188 at the ratio of 1:1, the intensity of the characteristic peaks in the XRPD pattern of crystalline CLX has been reduced. By increasing the ratio of polymer, these characteristic peaks were completely vanished at the ratio of 1:4 CLX:PLX (Figure 3). The peaks at

 2θ value of 19° and 23° which are related to PLX, show lower intensity compared to pure PLX.

 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR)

Figures 4 and 5 show the FT-IR spectra of pure CLX, PVP and PLX, their physical mixtures and solid dispersion samples. As it is shown in Figures 4 and 5, CLX showed its characteristic peaks at 3341 and 3234 cm^-1 which were related to N-H stretching vibration of sulfonamide group, 1347 and 1165 cm^-1 for the S=O asymmetric and symmetric stretching and 1230 and 1275 cm^-1 for symmetric and asymmetric C-F stretching. The intensity of the characteristic peaks has been reduced in solid dispersion samples compared to its physical mixture.

 Dissolution studies

The dissolution profiles of pure CLX, PM and SD samples with PVP-K30 (A and B) or PLX (C and D), are shown in Figure 6. As it is shown in Figure 6 (A and B, C and D), the presence of PVP or PLX could improve the dissolution rate of CLX in PM and SD samples.

 Discussion

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)

It has been previously reported that drug/polymer intermolecular interactions play a critical role in the stabilization of amorphous solid dispersion formulations. This stabilization of high energy amorphous systems is mostly dependent on drug/polymer miscibility and glass transition temperature of solid matrix (14). So, it is important to have an analytical method that allows the investigation of physicochemical properties. Methods such as DSC, XRPD, FTIR and dissolution test are often used for this purpose.

DSC analyses were performed in order to investigate the thermal behavior of the components of the samples. In solid dispersion or physical mixture samples, absence or shifting of the melting point of the drug to the lower temperature indicates the possibility of drug/polymer miscibility. Moreover, in solid dispersion samples, absence or shifting of the T_g of drug to the higher temperature has been previously reported (14, 15). As it is shown in Figure 1A, the absence of melting point of CLX in solid dispersion samples at the ratio of 1:1 CLX:PVP  indicates the conversion of CLX to an amorphous state, while the presence of single peak of T_g at 125.10ºC proves the miscibility of CLX in the PVP. The observed T_g value is significantly higher than that of amorphous CLX, suggesting that the molecular mobility of CLX within the SD samples could be reduced. Moreover, calculation of theoretical T_g values according to Gordon-Taylor equation (89°C) and comparison with experimental value (125°C), confirmed a positive deviation from the ideal behavior.  These results are indicative of a strong interaction between CLX and PVP and increased rigidity of the matrix network of their solid dispersion systems and hence the stabilization of formulation (14). Similar results have been also reported by Andrews et al (5). In addition, the absence of recrystallization exotherm indicates that PVP-K30 inhibited the mobility and hence recrystallization of CLX when it was heated above T_g.

As it is shown in Figure 1B, the PLX-188 showed the melting point at 53.49°C which is in agreement with the literature data (10). Absence of CLX melting endothermic peak in 1:1 PM is attributed to the dissolution of CLX in the molten PLX. Figure 1B clearly shows the formation of eutectic mixture in solid dispersion systems. Samples with CLX:PLX 1:2 ratio exhibited the lowest melting point at 43.33°C. Samples with 2:1 and 1:1 ratios also produced eutectic mixtures with melting points at 45.32°C and 45.41°C, respectively.  In these samples, presence of a very small and broad melting endothermic peak could be attributed to the excess amount of CLX which did not form an eutectic mixture with PLX. Similar results have been reported for solid dispersion systems of PLX-188 and ibuprofen (10).  As the drug is miscible with PLX-188, during the preparation of solid dispersions, the drug molecules could penetrate into the crystalline structure of PLX and this could prevent the formation of crystalline state after the mixture is being cooled. As a result, PLX could be formed with weaker structure, compared to its primary form. Hence, it could be melted at lower temperature and could show a broad melting peak (16).

In general, solid dispersion samples containing PVP-K30 and CLX could be more stable than those containing PLX and CLX due to higher T_g. This could reduce the possibility of recrystalization of CLX during storage.  

 X-ray powder diffraction studies (XRPD)

X-ray diffraction analysis of CLX showed sharp peaks at 2θ values of 5°, 10.5°, 16° and 21.5° indicating the crystalline nature of CLX (17). PVP showed completely amorphous state with absence of any diffraction peaks, whilst PLX-188 showed two peaks at 19° and 23° corresponding to the crystalline structure of PLX (16). As it is shown in Figure 2, there are no peaks in all solid dispersion samples of drug and PVP-K30. This indicates that the CLX has been completely converted to an amorphous state in the presence of PVP-K30. In solid dispersion samples with the ratio of 1:1 drug to carrier, CLX is completely amorphous and by increasing the ratio of polymer, no remarkable changes could be detected in XRPD pattern.

In solid dispersion samples of drug and PLX-188 at the ratio of 1:1 drug to carrier, the intensity of the

characteristic peaks in the XRPD pattern of crystalline CLX has been obviously reduced. However, by increasing the ratio of polymer, these characteristic peaks were completely diminished at the ratio of 1:4 CLX:PLX (Figure 3). The peaks at 2θ value of 19 and 23 which are related to PLX, show lower intensity compared to pure PLX due to dilution of polymer with CLX. The XRPD results confirmed the results of DSC studies and accounted for the formation of the amorphous state of CLX in the presence of PVP-K30 and PLX in solid dispersion samples.