Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences

Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences

Modular 3D culture platform combining methylcellulose, testicular ECM, and Sertoli cells for in vitro spermatogenesis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Research Institute for Urology and Nephrology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran, Iran
3 Legal Medicine Research Center, Legal Medicine Organization, Tehran, Iran
4 Research Laboratory for Embryology and Stem Cells, Department of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
5 Infertility Department, Alavi Hospital, Ardabil University of Medical Science, Ardabil, Iran
6 Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
7 Bernal Institute and School of Engineering, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
8 Department of Infertility, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
9 Department of Life Science Engineering, Faculty of New Science and Technology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
10 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molud Infertility Treatment Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
11 Clinical Immunology Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
12 Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
13 Medical Plants Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
14 Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
15 Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
10.22038/ijbms.2026.93648.20214
Abstract
Objective(s): We aimed to develop and characterize a 3D culture platform combining methylcellulose (MC) with decellularized testicular extracellular matrix (ECM) and Sertoli cell co-culture to support human spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) survival and differentiation.
Materials and Methods: Human testicular cells were isolated and characterized by immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. Sheep testicular tissue was decellularized using detergents and characterized by several histology techniques. ECM was solubilized and mixed with MC at various ratios to make hybrid hydrogels. Hydrogels were characterized for pore size, porosity, mechanical properties, gelation kinetics, and degradation kinetics using scanning electron microscopy, rheological analysis, turbidity analysis, and mass loss assays. Human SSCs and Sertoli cells were cultured in 3D hydrogels for four weeks under differentiation conditions. Cell viability was assessed using the MTT assay, and gene expression of SSC, meiotic, post-meiotic, and apoptotic markers was evaluated by RT-PCR.
Results: After four weeks of proliferation, PLZF-positive cells increased from 19% to 73%. Decellularization reduced DNA content by 96% while preserving key matrix components. Hybrid hydrogels displayed interconnected porous structures with pore sizes of about 65–181 µm. All functional hydrogels supported cell viability; however, ECM-rich hydrogels significantly up-regulated PRM2 compared to 2D controls, indicating enhanced post-meiotic differentiation. MC-only scaffolds displayed elevated pro-apoptotic BAX expression compared to ECM-rich matrices, suggesting that bioactive ECM ligands confer cytoprotection.
Conclusion: The modular MC/ECM hybrid hydrogel provides a tunable, physiologically relevant 3D culture system that is superior to conventional approaches in supporting SSC maintenance and differentiation, offering promise for fertility preservation strategies.
Keywords
Subjects

1.Vij SC, Gilligan T. Chemotherapy and fertility. Cancer and fertility: Springer; 2016. p. 97-107.
2. Wyns C, Kanbar M, Giudice MG, Poels J. Fertility preservation for prepubertal boys: lessons learned from the past and update on remaining challenges towards clinical translation. Hum Reprod Update 2021; 27:433-459.
3. Abofoul-Azab M, Lunenfeld E, Levitas E, Zeadna A, Younis JS, Bar-Ami S, et al. Identification of premeiotic, meiotic, and postmeiotic cells in testicular biopsies without sperm from Sertoli cell-only syndrome patients. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:470.
4. Alves-Lopes JP, Söder O, Stukenborg J-B. Testicular organoid generation by a novel in vitro three-layer gradient system. Biomaterials 2017; 130:76-89.
5. Baert Y, Dvorakova-Hortova K, Margaryan H, Goossens E. Mouse in vitro spermatogenesis on alginate-based 3D bioprinted scaffolds. Biofabrication 2019; 11:035011.
6. Stukenborg J-B, Schlatt S, Simoni M, Yeung C-H, Elhija MA, Luetjens CM, et al. New horizons for in vitro spermatogenesis? an update on novel three-dimensional culture systems as tools for meiotic and post-meiotic differentiation of testicular germ cells. Mol Hum Reprod 2009; 15:521-529.
7. Salem M, Khadivi F, Javanbakht P, Mojaverrostami S, Abbasi M, Feizollahi N, et al. Advances of three-dimensional (3D) culture systems for in vitro spermatogenesis. Stem Cell Res Ther 2023; 14:262.
8. Nguyen AV, Julian S, Weng N, Flannigan R. Advances in human In vitro spermatogenesis: A review. Mol Aspects Med 2024; 100:101320.
9. Bashiri Z, Amiri I, Gholipourmalekabadi M, Falak R, Asgari H, Maki CB, et al. Artificial testis: a testicular tissue extracellular matrix as a potential bio-ink for 3D printing. Biomater Sci 2021; 9:3465-3484.
10. Sun M, Yuan Q, Niu M, Wang H, Wen L, Yao C, et al. Efficient generation of functional haploid spermatids from human germline stem cells by three-dimensional-induced system. Cell Death Differ 2018; 25:749-766.
11. Niemczyk-Soczynska B, Gradys A, Kolbuk D, Krzton-Maziopa A, Rogujski P, Stanaszek L, et al. A methylcellulose/agarose hydrogel as an innovative scaffold for tissue engineering. RSC Adv 2022; 12:26882-26894.
12. Cuéllar Gaona CG, Ibarra Alonso MC, Narro Céspedes RI, Téllez Rosas MM, Reyna Martínez R, Luévanos Escareño MP. Novel studies in the designs of natural, synthetic, and compound hydrogels with biomedical applications. Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Biomédica 2023; 44:74-96.
13. Jabari A, Gholami K, Khadivi F, Koruji M, Amidi F, Gilani MAS, et al. In vitro complete differentiation of human spermatogonial stem cells to morphologic spermatozoa using a hybrid hydrogel of agarose and laminin. Int J Biol Macromol 2023; 235:123801.
14. Huleihel M, Nourashrafeddin S, Plant TM. Application of three-dimensional culture systems to study mammalian spermatogenesis, with an emphasis on the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Asian J Androl 2015; 17:972-980.
15. Abofoul-Azab M, AbuMadighem A, Lunenfeld E, Kapelushnik J, Shi Q, Pinkas H, et al. Development of postmeiotic cells in vitro from spermatogonial cells of prepubertal cancer patients. Stem Cells Dev 2018; 27:1007-1020.
16. Gou Y, Wang A, Ding L, Yang X, Lu X, Qi Q, et al. A comprehensive review on protein‐based hydrogels: from structure modification to applications. ChemistrySelect 2025; 10:e202405618.
17. Yang Y, Lin Q, Zhou C, Li Q, Li Z, Cao Z, et al. A testis-derived hydrogel as an efficient feeder-free culture platform to promote mouse spermatogonial stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020; 8:250.
18. Di Filippo F, Brevini TAL, Pennarossa G, Gandolfi F. Generation of bovine decellularized testicular bio-scaffolds as a 3D platform for testis bioengineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2024; 12:1532107.
19. Afshari F, Alaee S, Dara M, Shadi M, Chenari N, Ramezani A, et al. The synergic impact of decellularized testis scaffold and extracellular vesicles derived from human semen on spermatogonial stem cell survival and differentiation. Biomed Eng Online 2025; 24:94.
20. Kim EJ, Choi JS, Kim JS, Choi YC, Cho YW. Injectable and thermosensitive soluble extracellular matrix and methylcellulose hydrogels for stem cell delivery in skin wounds. Biomacromolecules 2016; 17:4-11.
21. Kim DW, Kim EJ, Kim EN, Sung MW, Kwon T-K, Cho YW, et al. Human adipose tissue derived extracellular matrix and methylcellulose hydrogels augments and regenerates the paralyzed vocal fold. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0165265.
22. Kim JS, Choi JS, Cho YW. Cell-free hydrogel system based on a tissue-specific extracellular matrix for in situ adipose tissue regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017; 9:8581-8588.
23. Murdock MH, David S, Swinehart IT, Reing JE, Tran K, Gassei K, et al. Human testis extracellular matrix enhances human spermatogonial stem cell survival in vitro. Tissue Eng Part A 2019; 25:663-676.
24. Vermeulen M, Del Vento F, De Michele F, Poels J, Wyns C. Development of a cytocompatible scaffold from pig immature testicular tissue allowing human sertoli cell attachment, proliferation and functionality. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:227.
25. Contessi N, Altomare L, Filipponi A, Farè S. Thermo-responsive properties of methylcellulose hydrogels for cell sheet engineering. Mater Lett 2017; 207:157-160.
26. Forghani A, Devireddy R. Methylcellulose based thermally reversible hydrogels. Adipose-Derived Stem Cells: Methods and Protocols: Springer; 2018. p. 41-51.
27. Gao Y, Wang Z, Long Y, Yang L, Jiang Y, Ding D, et al. Unveiling the roles of Sertoli cells lineage differentiation in reproductive development and disorders: A review. Front Endocrinol 2024; 15:1357594.
28. Johnson L, Thompson Jr DL, Varner DD. Role of Sertoli cell number and function on regulation of spermatogenesis. Anim Reprod Sci 2008; 105:23-51.
29. Ding L-J, Yan G-J, Ge Q-Y, Yu F, Zhao X, Diao Z-Y, et al. FSH acts on the proliferation of type A spermatogonia via Nur77 that increases GDNF expression in the Sertoli cells. FEBS Lett 2011; 585:2437-2444.
30. Dovere L, Fera S, Grasso M, Lamberti D, Gargioli C, Muciaccia B, et al. The niche-derived glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) induces migration of mouse spermatogonial stem/progenitor cells. PLoS One 2013; 8:e59431.
31. Salem M, Khadivi F, Feizollahi N, Khodarahmian M, Marghmaleki MS, Ayub S, et al. Melatonin promotes differentiation of human spermatogonial stem cells cultured on three-dimensional decellularized human testis matrix. Urol J 2024; 21:250-264.
32. Heidarian E, Naji M, Setareyi R, Shirinsokhan A, Rahimpour M, Torbati PM, et al. Comparing collagen and decellularized extracellular matrix in different fabrication contexts for bladder tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 2026; 114:e70015.
33. Ahmadian Z, Correia A, Hasany M, Figueiredo P, Dobakhti F, Eskandari MR, et al. A hydrogen-bonded extracellular matrix-mimicking bactericidal hydrogel with radical scavenging and hemostatic function for ph-responsive wound healing acceleration. Adv Healthc Mater 2021; 10:e2001122.
34. Liu Q, Dai W, Gao Y, Li S, Zhao X, Jia H, et al. The degradation rate of collagen-based hydrogels regulates chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Collagen Leather 2025; 7:39.
35. Fernández-Pérez J, Ahearne M. The impact of decellularization methods on extracellular matrix derived hydrogels. Sci Rep 2019; 9:14933.
36. Saldin LT, Cramer MC, Velankar SS, White LJ, Badylak SF. Extracellular matrix hydrogels from decellularized tissues: Structure and function. Acta Biomater 2017; 49:1-15.
37. Kasravi M, Ahmadi A, Babajani A, Mazloomnejad R, Hatamnejad MR, Shariatzadeh S, et al. Immunogenicity of decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: A bottleneck in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomater Res 2023; 27:10.
38. Hashemi E, Movahedin M, Ghiaseddin A, Aghamir SMK. In vitro spermatogenesis on human decellularized testicular matrix plates following exosome treatment in a dynamic culture system. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2025; 21:454-465.
39. Mitchell RT, Saunders PT, Childs AJ, Cassidy-Kojima C, Anderson RA, Wallace WH, et al. Xenografting of human fetal testis tissue: a new approach to study fetal testis development and germ cell differentiation. Hum Reprod 2010; 25:2405-2414.
40. Caliari SR, Burdick JA. A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture. Nat Methods 2016; 13:405-414.
41. Rivero RE, Capella V, Liaudat AC, Bosch P, Barbero CA, Rodríguez N, et al. Mechanical and physicochemical behavior of a 3D hydrogel scaffold during cell growth and proliferation. RSC Adv 2020; 10:5827-5837.
42. Li H, Wijekoon A, Leipzig ND. 3D differentiation of neural stem cells in macroporous photopolymerizable hydrogel scaffolds. PLoS One 2012; 7:e48824.
43. Mukasheva F, Adilova L, Dyussenbinov A, Yernaimanova B, Abilev M, Akilbekova D. Optimizing scaffold pore size for tissue engineering: insights across various tissue types. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2024; 12:1444986.
44. Yadav P, Beniwal G, Saxena KK. A review on pore and porosity in tissue engineering. Mater Today Proc 2021; 44:2623-2628.
45. Jeong CG, Hollister SJ. Mechanical, permeability, and degradation properties of 3D designed poly(1,8 octanediol-co-citrate) scaffolds for soft tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 93:141-149.
46.Mendoza-Novelo B, Claudio-Rizo JA, Delgado J, Quintero-Ortega I, Mata-Mata J. Decellularized ECM-derived hydrogels: Modification and properties. In: Haider S, Haider A, editors. Hydrogels. London: IntechOpen; 2018.
47. Mndlovu H, Kumar P, du Toit LC, Choonara YE. A review of biomaterial degradation assessment approaches employed in the biomedical field. NPJ Mater Degrad 2024; 8:66.
48. Hofman K, Tucker N, Stanger J, Staiger M, Marshall S, Hall B. Effects of the molecular format of collagen on characteristics of electrospun fibres. J Mater Sci 2012; 47:1148-1155.
49. Ding C, Shi R, Zheng Z, Zhang M. Effect of carboxymethylcellulose on fibril formation of collagen in vitro. Connect Tissue Res 2018; 59:66-72.
50. Taddei ML, Giannoni E, Fiaschi T, Chiarugi P. Anoikis: an emerging hallmark in health and diseases. J Pathol 2012; 226:380-393.
51. Wang Y, Navin Nicholas E. Advances and applications of single-cell sequencing technologies. Mol Cell 2015; 58:598-609.