Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences

Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences

Effects of siRNA-mediated TIGIT silencing on NK cell cytotoxicity against triple-negative and luminal breast cancer cells

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Clinical Biochemistry Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
2 Cancer Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
3 Medical Plants Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
4 Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
5 Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Advanced Technologies, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
6 Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran
7 Department of Biomedical & Molecular Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
10.22038/ijbms.2026.96441.20786
Abstract
Objective(s): TIGIT is an inhibitory immune checkpoint receptor expressed on NK and T cells. TIGIT interaction with CD155/CD112 suppresses anti-tumor immunity. We investigated whether siRNA-mediated TIGIT silencing in primary human NK cells enhances cytotoxicity against triple-negative (MDA-MB-231) and luminal (MCF-7) breast cancer cells.
Materials and Methods: NK cells were isolated from three treatment-naïve breast cancer patients and three healthy donors. For cytotoxicity assays, NK cells from the best‑expanding donor per group were selected; results are exploratory estimates. Cells were transfected with TIGIT‑specific or scrambled siRNA. TIGIT expression was assessed by qRT‑PCR, and cytotoxicity was measured using an AlamarBlue assay at an E:T ratio of 5:1.
Results: Baseline TIGIT expression was 1.5‑fold higher in patient‑derived NK cells (P=0.027). TIGIT silencing increased cytotoxicity against MDA‑MB‑231 cells by 9 percentage points in healthy donor NK cells (from 41% to 50%) and by 7 percentage points in patient NK cells (from 51% to 58%). Against MCF‑7 cells, increases were modest — only 3 to 3.5 percentage points (healthy: from 37.5% to 41%; patient: from 28% to 31%). Cytotoxicity values are descriptive estimates due to single‑donor assays. Across all conditions, patient NK cells were more active than healthy NK cells.
Conclusion: TIGIT silencing in primary human NK cells was associated with increased cytotoxicity against MDA‑MB‑231 cells but not against MCF‑7 cells. These preliminary findings support further investigation of TIGIT‑targeted NK cell therapy for triple‑negative breast cancer.
Keywords
Subjects

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74: 229-263.
2. Fumagalli C, Barberis M. Breast cancer heterogeneity. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11: 1555.
3. Bianchini G, De Angelis C, Licata L, Gianni L. Treatment landscape of triple-negative breast cancer-expanded options, evolving needs. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19: 91-113.
4. Huang Z, Yu P, Tang J. Characterization of triple-negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell spheroid model. Onco Targets Ther 2020; 13: 5395-5405.
5. Comsa S, Cimpean AM, Raica M. The story of MCF-7 breast cancer cell line: 40 years of experience in research. Anticancer Res 2015; 35: 3147-3154.
6. Lim E, Palmieri C, Tilley WD. Renewed interest in the progesterone receptor in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2016; 115: 909-911.
7. Burguin A, Diorio C, Durocher F. Breast cancer treatments: updates and new challenges. J Pers Med 2021; 11: 808.
8. Gupta GK, Collier AL, Lee D, Hoefer RA, Zheleva V, Siewertsz van Reesema LL, et al. Perspectives on triple-negative breast cancer: current treatment strategies, unmet needs, and potential targets for future therapies. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12: 2392.
9. Shimasaki N, Jain A, Campana D. NK cells for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2020; 19: 200-218.
10. Maskalenko NA, Zhigarev D, Campbell KS. Harnessing natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy: Dispatching the first responders. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2022; 21: 559-577.
11. Mamessier E, Sylvain A, Thibult ML, Houvenaeghel G, Jacquemier J, Castellano R, et al. Human breast cancer cells enhance self tolerance by promoting evasion from NK cell antitumor immunity. J Clin Invest 2011; 121: 3609-3622.
12. Jia H, Yang H, Xiong H, Luo KQ. NK cell exhaustion in the tumor microenvironment. Front Immunol 2023; 14: 1303605.
13. Merino AM, Kim H, Miller JS, Cichocki F. Unraveling exhaustion in adaptive and conventional NK cells. J Leukoc Biol 2020; 108: 1361-1368.
14. Zhang P, Liu X, Gu Z, Jiang Z, Zhao S, Song Y, et al. Targeting TIGIT for cancer immunotherapy: Recent advances and future directions. Biomark Res 2024; 12: 7.
15. Cai L, Li Y, Tan J, Xu L, Li Y. Targeting LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT for cancer immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol 2023; 16: 101.
16. Paolini R, Molfetta R. CD155 and its receptors as targets for cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24: 12958.
17. Dougall WC, Kurtulus S, Smyth MJ, Anderson AC. TIGIT and CD96: new checkpoint receptor targets for cancer immunotherapy. Immunol Rev 2017; 276: 112-120.
18. Manieri NA, Chiang EY, Grogan JL. TIGIT: A key inhibitor of the cancer immunity cycle. Trends Immunol 2017; 38: 20-28.
19. Guo C, Luo Z, Ismtula D, Bi X, Kong H, Wang Y, et al. TIGIT as a novel prognostic marker for immune infiltration in invasive breast cancer. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2023; 26: 639-651.
20. Zhang Q, Gao C, Shao J, Wang Z. TIGIT-related transcriptome profile and its association with tumor immune microenvironment in breast cancer. Biosci Rep 2021; 41: BSR20204340.
21. Abbasov A, Aktas Cetin ES, Cabioglu N, Mollavelioglu B, Onder S, Emiroglu S, et al. Differential expression of novel immune checkpoint receptors on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with locally advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoplasma 2021; 68: 1079-1090.
22. Monteran L, Ershaid N, Scharff Y, Zoabi Y, Sanalla T, Ding Y, et al. Combining TIGIT blockade with MDSC inhibition hinders breast cancer bone metastasis by activating antitumor immunity. Cancer Discov 2024; 14: 1252-1275.
23. Rousseau A, Parisi C, Barlesi F. Anti-TIGIT therapies for solid tumors: a systematic review. ESMO Open 2023; 8: 101184.
24. Toffoli EC, Sheikhi A, Lameris R, King LA, van Vliet A, Walcheck B, et al. Enhancement of NK cell antitumor effector functions using a bispecific single domain antibody targeting CD16 and the epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13: 5446.
25. Tang Q, Khvorova A. RNAi-based drug design: considerations and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2024; 23: 341-364.
26. Wang CE, Zhen D, Yang L, Li G. Clinical development prospects of siRNA drugs for tumor therapy: analysis of clinical trial registration data from 2004 to 2024. Front Pharmacol 2025; 16: 1637958.
27. Zheng Q, Gao J, Yin P, Wang W, Wang B, Li Y, et al. CD155 contributes to the mesenchymal phenotype of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Sci 2020; 111: 383-394.
28. Sheikhi A, Saadati K, Jafarzadeh A, Karimi H, Mousavinasab N. Augmenting the expression of NKp44 molecule and the natural killer activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with malignant colorectal carcinoma. Drug Res (Stuttg) 2014; 64: 281-286.
29. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29: e45.
30. Nociari MM, Shalev A, Benias P, Russo C. A novel one-step, highly sensitive fluorometric assay to evaluate cell-mediated cytotoxicity. J Immunol Methods 1998; 213: 157-167.
31. Maas RJ, Hoogstad-van Evert JS, Van der Meer JM, Mekers V, Rezaeifard S, Korman AJ, et al. TIGIT blockade enhances functionality of peritoneal NK cells with altered expression of DNAM-1/TIGIT/CD96 checkpoint molecules in ovarian cancer. Oncoimmunology 2020; 9: 1843247.
32. Sivori S, Vacca P, Del Zotto G, Munari E, Mingari MC, Moretta L. Human NK cells: Surface receptors, inhibitory checkpoints, and translational applications. Cell Mol Immunol 2019; 16: 430-441.
33. Chen L, Flies DB. Molecular mechanisms of T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition. Nat Rev Immunol 2013; 13: 227-242.
34. Roe K. NK-cell exhaustion, B-cell exhaustion and T-cell exhaustion-the differences and similarities. Immunology 2022; 166: 155-168.
35. Da Silva IP, Gallois A, Jimenez-Baranda S, Khan S, Anderson AC, Kuchroo VK, et al. Reversal of NK-cell exhaustion in advanced melanoma by Tim-3 blockade. Cancer Immunol Res 2014; 2: 410-422.
36. Kuznetsova AV, Glukhova XA, Beletsky IP, Ivanov AA. NK cell activity in the tumor microenvironment. Front Cell Dev Biol 2025; 13: 1609479.
37. Schlums H, Cichocki F, Tesi B, Theorell J, Beziat V, Holmes TD, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection drives adaptive epigenetic diversification of NK cells with altered signaling and effector function. Immunity 2015; 42: 443-456.
38. Goel S, DeCristo MJ, Watt AC, BrinJones H, Sceneay J, Li BB, et al. CDK4/6 inhibition triggers anti-tumour immunity. Nature 2017; 548: 471-475.
39. Liu E, Marin D, Banerjee P, Macapinlac HA, Thompson P, Basar R, et al. Use of CAR-transduced natural killer cells in CD19-positive lymphoid tumors. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 545-553.
40. Xia W, Chen J, Hou W, Chen J, Xiong Y, Li H, et al. Engineering a HER2-CAR-NK cell secreting soluble programmed cell death protein with superior antitumor efficacy. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24: 6843.
41. Heipertz EL, Zynda ER, Stav-Noraas TE, Hungler AD, Boucher SE, Kaur N, et al. Current perspectives on ‘off-the-shelf’ allogeneic NK and CAR-NK cell therapies. Front Immunol 2021; 12: 732135.
42. Hasan MF, Campbell AR, Croom-Perez TJ, Oyer JL, Dieffenthaller TA, Robles-Carrillo LD, et al. Knockout of the inhibitory receptor TIGIT enhances the antitumor response of ex vivo expanded NK cells and prevents fratricide with therapeutic Fc-active TIGIT antibodies. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11: e007502.
43. Jo DH, Kaczmarek S, Shin O, Wang L, Cowan J, McComb S, et al. Simultaneous engineering of natural killer cells for CAR transgenesis and CRISPR-Cas9 knockout using retroviral particles. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 2023; 29: 173-184.
44. Sheikhi A, Jafarzadeh A. A new therapeutic potential for cancers: one CAR with 2 different engines! Hum Vaccin Immunother 2017; 13: 1786-1788.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 10 November 2026