Roughness Model for Adhesion Testing of Pharmaceutical Coating Materials

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Pharmaceutics,school of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, mashhad, IRAN

2 Department of Pharmacy, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.


Roughness is the main parameter in interlocking bonding mechanism. Yet there is no model designed to evaluate the effect of surface roughness on adhesion of coating materials in pharmaceutical sciences.
Materials and Methods
In this study polymethyl metacrylate spherical beads with different sizes were poured into 10 mm mold, then it was pressed by hand screw and finally heated to 141o C. The texture of the resulted surfaces of the discs was quantified and qualified for roughness using Surface Texture Measurement Instrum Model Sarcum110 and SEM, respectively. Solutions of Hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (HPMC E15) and polyvinylpyrrolidon (PVP K90) were used as binding agents. After conditioning, shear testing technique was carried out for bond strength evaluation using calibrated shear cell bar.
The resulted bond strengths were in the rank order of decreasing particle size and HPMC E15 resulted in higher bond strength.
It could be concluded that this model of roughness, which is easy to prepare, is suitable for studying adhesion of pharmaceutical binders.


1.Healy A.M., Corrigan O.I., Allan JEM., 1995, the effect of dissolution on the surface texture of model solid-dosage forms as assessed by non-contact laser profilometry. Pharm. Technol. Eur., 9:14-22.
2.Podczeck F., 1998, Measurement of surface roughness of tablets made from polyethylene glycol powders of various molecular weights. Pharm. Pharmacol. Commun, 4:179-182.
3.Riippi M., Antikainen O., Niskanen T., Yliruusi J., 1998,  The effect of compression force on surface structure, crushing strength, friability and disintegration time of erythromycin acistrate tablets. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 46:339-345.
4.Ohmori S., Ohno Y., Makino T., Kashihara T. ,2004, Improvement of impact toughness of sugar-coated tablets manufactured by dusting method. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). , 52: 322-328.
5.Felton L, McGinity J.W., 1999, Adhesion of polymeric films to pharmaceutical solids. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. , 47:3-14.
6.Missaghi S., Fassihi R.., 2004, A novel approach in the assessment of polymeric film formation and film adhesion on different pharmaceutical solid substrates. AAPS Pharm.Sci.Tech. 5:E29.
7.Reiland T.L, Eber A.C., 1986, Aqueous gloss solutions: formula and process. Variables effects on the surface texture of film coated tablets. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 12:231-245.
8.Rohera B.D., Parikh N.H., 2002, Influence of plasticizer type and coat level on Surelease film properties, Pharm Dev. Technol., 7:407-420.
9. Jenning, C.W., 1972, Surface roughness and bond strength of adhesives, J. Adhesion, 4:25-38.
10.Rowe, R.C., 1979, surface roughness measurement on both uncoated and film coated tablets, J.Pharm.Pharmacol. 31:473-474.
11.Podczeck F., Newton J.M.1995, Evaluation of three dimensional shape factors for the quantitative assessment of sphericity and surface roughness of pellets, Int. J.Pharm., 124:253-259.
12.Podczeck F., 1998, Measurement of roughness of tablet made from polyethylene glycol powders of various molecular weights, J.Pharm.Pharmacol.Comm.4:179-182.
13.Li T.,Park K.,1998,Fractal analysis of pharmaceutical particles by atomic force microscopy, Pharm.Res.,15:1222-1232.
 14.Smith P.,Smith R.,Grist, A.W., Smart N.,et al., 2000,Atomic force microscopy (AFM) investigation of bioadhesive polymer adsorption on to human buccal cells, Int J.Pharm.,271-277.
15.Heng P.W., Chan L.W., Lim L.T., 2000,Quantification of the surface morphologies of lactose and their effect on the in vitro deposition of salbutamol sulfate, Chem.Pharm.Bull.48:393-398.
16.Silvennoinen R.,Peiponen K.E.,Hyvarinen V.,Raatikainen P.,Paronen,P.,1999, Int.J.Pharm.,48:213-220.
17.Nadkarni P.D.,Kildsik D.O.,Kramer P.A.,Banker G.S.1975,Effect of Surface Roughness and Solvent on Film Adhesion to Tablets, J.Pharm.Sci.,64:1554-1557.
18.Windholz,M.,The Merck Index,9th ed.,pub.,Merck & Co.INC, Rahway, U.S.A., misc, 1976,71.
19.Orafai H.,Spring M.,1996,Adhesion of pharmaceutical binding agents, Daru  , 6:648-53.
20.Lungtana-anan M., Fell J.T., 1987, Surface energy determination on powders, Powder Tech., 52:215-218.
21.Kinloch A.J., 1980, The science of adhesion, surface and interface aspects, J.Mater.Sci. 15: 2141-2166.
22.Newitt D.M.,Conway-Jones J.H.,1958,Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineering, 36:422.
23.Fisher S.G.,Rowe R.C.,1976,The adhesion of film coating to tablet surfaces : instrumentation and preliminary evalution,J.Pharm.Pharmacol.,28:886-889.
24.Rowe R.C., 1977, the adhesion of film coating to tablet surfaces: the effect of some direct compression excipients and lubricants, J.Pharm.Pharmacol, 29:723-727.
25.Rowe, R.C., 1978, the measurement of the adhesion of film coating to tablet surfaces: the effect of tablet porosity, surface roughness and film thickness,J.Pharm.Pharmacol, 30:343-346.