The effect of sugar cane molasses on the immune and male reproductive systems using in vitro and in vivo methods

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Medical Bioscience, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville 7535, Republic of South Africa

Abstract

Objective(s): Sugar cane molasses is a commonly used ingredient in several food products. Contrasting reports suggest that molasses may have potential adverse or beneficial effects on human health. However, little evidence exists that examines the effects of molasses on the different physiological systems. This study investigated the effects of sugar cane molasses on various physiological systems using in vivo and in vitro methods.
Materials and Methods: Molasses was administered orally to BALB/c, male mice and animals were randomly assigned into either a treatment or control group. General physiological changes, body weight and molasses intake of animals were monitored. At the end of the exposure period, collected blood samples were evaluated for potential toxicity using plasma biomarkers and liver enzyme activity. Immunised treated and untreated mice were evaluated for antibody titre to determine the effect of molasses on the immune response. To investigate the impact of molasses on testicular steroidogenesis, testes from both treated and control groups were harvested, cultured and assayed for testosterone synthesis. 
Results: Findings suggest that fluid intake by molasses-treated animals was significantly increased and these animals showed symptoms of loose faeces. Molasses had no significant effect on body weight, serum biomarkers or liver enzyme activity (P>0.05).  Immunoglobulin-gamma anti-antigen levels were significantly suppressed in molasses-treated groups (P=0.004). Animals subjected to molasses exposure also exhibited elevated levels of testosterone synthesis (P=0.001).
Conclusion: Findings suggests that molasses adversely affects the humoral immune response. The results also promote the use of molasses as a supplement to increase testosterone levels.

Keywords

References

1. Wang BS, Chang LW, Kang ZC, Chu HL, Tai HM, Huang MH. Inhibitory effect of molasses on mutation and nitric oxide production. Food Chem 2011; 126:1102-1107.
2. Reyed RM, El-Diwany A. Molasses as bifidus promoter on bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria growing in skim milk.  Internet J Microbiol [serial online] 2008; 5:21. Available from: http://www.ispub.com. Accessed Feb 18 2010.
3. Guimarães CM, Gi˜ao MS, Martinez SS, Pintado AI, Pintado ME, Bento LS, et al. Antioxidant activity of sugar molasses including protective effect against DNA oxidative damage. J Food Sci 2007; 72:C39-C43.
4. Grandics P. Cancer: A single disease with a multitude of manifestions? J Carcinog [serial online] 2003; 2.  Available from: http://www.carcinogenesis.com. Accessed 2010 Aug 10.
5. Saska M, Chou CC. Antioxidant properties of sugar cane extracts. Proceedings of the First Biannual World Conference on Recent Development in Sugar Technologies in USA; 2002 May 16-17; Delray Beach, Florida, USA.
6. Kubena K, McMurrray DN. Nutrition and the immune system: A review of nutrient-nutrient interactions. J Am Diet Assoc 1996; 96:1156-1164.
7.  De Jong WH, Van Loveren H. Screening of xenobiotics for direct immunotoxicity in an animal study. Methods 2007; 41:3-8.
8. Krzystyniak K, Tryphonas H, Fourier M. Approaches to the evaluation of chemical induced immunotoxicity. Environ Health Perspect 1995; 103:17-22.
9. Nagai Y, Mizutani T, Iwabe H, Araki S, Suzuk M. Physiological functions of sugar cane extracts.  Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of Sugar Industry Technologists in Taiwan; 2001 May, Taipei, Taiwan.
10. Koge K, Nagai Y, Ebashi T, Iwabe H, El-Abasy M, Motobu M, et al. Physiological functions of sugar cane extracts: Growth promotion, immunopotentiation and anti-coccidial infection effects in chickens. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of Sugar Industry Technologists in USA; 2002 May, Delray Beach, Florida, USA.
11. Cellar M. Molasses as a possible cause of endocrine disruptive syndrome in cattle. [dissertation]. South Africa: Pretoria University; 2006.
12. Preston TR, Sansoucy R, Aarts G, editors. Molasses as animal feed: An overview. Proceedings of an FAO Expert Consultation on Sugarcane as Feed; 1986; Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
13. Masgoret MS, Botha CJ, Myburgh JG, Naudé TW, Prozesky L, Naidoo V, et al. Molasses as a possible cause of an “endocrine disruptive syndrome.”  Onderstepoort J Vet Res 2009; 76:209-225.
14. Evans JT. Reproductive toxicity and endocrine disruption. In: Gupta RC, editor. Veterinary Toxicology. New York: Elsevier Inc; 2007.p. 206-244.
15. Ncibi S, Othman NB, Akakha A, Krifi MN, Zourgui L. Opuntia ficus India extract protects against chlorpyrifos-induced damage to mice liver.  Food Chem Toxicol 2008; 46:797-802.
16. Stamati PN, Pitsos MA. The impact of endocrine disruptors on the female reproductive system. Hum Reprod Upd 2001; 7:323-330.
17. Rahiman F, Pool EJ. Preliminary study on the effect of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum) molasses on steroidogenesis in testicular cell cultures.  Afr J Food Sci 2010; 4: 37-40.
18. Rahiman F, Pool EJ. The effects of Saccharum officinarium (sugar cane) molasses on cytokine secretion by human blood cultures. J Immunoassay  Immunochem 2010; 31:148-159.
19. Heinemann WW, Hanks EM. Cane Molasses in Cattle Finishing Rations. J Anim Sci 1977; 45:13-17.
20. Rowe JB, Bobadilla M, Fernandez A, Encarnacion JC, Preston TR. Molasses toxicity in cattle: rumen fermentation and blood glucose entry rates associated with this condition (1977). Trop Anim Prod 1977; 4:78-89.
21. Bachmanov AA, Reed DR, Beauchamp GK Tordoff MG. Food intake, water intake and drinking spout side preference of 28 Mouse Strains. Behav Genet 2002; 32:435-443.
22. National Institute of Health (US). Guidelines for the use of adjuvants in research. National Institute of Health, Office of animal care and use; 2007.  Available from: http://www.oacu.od.nih.gov/ arac/-freunds.pdf. Accessed Jan 10, 2010.
23. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem1976; 72:248-254.
24. Pate FM. Molasses in beef nutrition. In: Molasses in animal nutrition. Iowa: National Feed Ingredients Association; 1983 Available from: http://rcrec-ona.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf/publications/molasses-beef-nutrition.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2009.
25. Lin JY, Lu S, Liou YL, Liou HL. Increased IgA and IgG serum levels using a novel yam-boxthorn noodle in a BALB/C mouse model.  Food Chem Toxicol 2006; 44:170-178.
26. Karacaoğlu E, Selmanoğlu G. Effects of heat-induced food contaminant furan on reproductive system of male rats from weaning through postpuberty. Food Chem Toxicol 2010; 48:1293-1301.
27. Hsu CC, Huanga YL, Tsaib SJ, Sheuc CC, Huanga BM. In vivo and in vitro stimulatory effects of Cordyceps sinensis on testosterone production in mouse Leydig cells. Life Sci 2003; 73:2127-2136.
Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences
Volume 19, Issue 10
October 2016
Pages 1125-1130

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics