Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences

Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences

Fabrication of a five-layer wound dressing containing chitosan-LL37 peptide for the treatment of EB wounds and deep exudate patients

Articles in Press

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Morteza Rabiei 1
Mehrdad Mosazadeh Moghadam 2
Hossein Derakhshankhah 3
Ramezan Ali Taheri 1
1 Nanobiotechnology Research Center, New Health Technologies Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, New Health Technologies Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
10.22038/ijbms.2026.94276.20323
Abstract
Objective(s): This study aimed to develop and evaluate a multifunctional five-layer wound dressing that meets essential requirements for effective wound healing, including exudate absorption, antimicrobial activity, moisture retention, gas exchange, and non-damaging adhesion. The specific objective was to assess the antibacterial efficacy, biocompatibility, and wound-healing performance of a dressing incorporating chitosan–LL37 nanoparticles (CS-LL37 NPs).
Materials and Methods: A five-layer wound dressing was fabricated, consisting of a silicone adhesive layer, a polyurethane (PU) foam layer embedded with CS-LL37 NPs, a polypropylene diffusion layer, a cellulose-based retention layer, and a breathable, waterproof backing layer. The CS-LL37 NPs were incorporated into the PU layer, and their antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity were evaluated in vitro. The dressing’s wound-healing performance, with and without CS-LL37 NPs, was assessed in vivo in a female Wistar rat model and compared with that of a commercial dressing (Mepilex Border).
Results: The developed five-layer dressing demonstrated effective exudate management, antimicrobial activity, and favorable healing conditions. In vivo results showed wound closure rates and histological outcomes comparable to those of the commercial dressing. The inclusion of CS-LL37 NPs enhanced antibacterial performance without inducing significant cytotoxicity, indicating good biocompatibility.
Conclusion: The prepared five-layer wound dressing exhibited healing performance comparable to a commercially available product. The incorporation of CS-LL37 nanoparticles showed significant potential to improve treatment outcomes, particularly for exudative wounds, and may be a promising option for patients with chronic or fragile-skin conditions such as Epidermolysis Bullosa.
Keywords
Antibacterial peptide
Chitosan
Epidermolysis bullosa (EB)
PDMS
Wound healing
Subjects
1. Mohania V, Deshpande TD, Singh YR, Patil S, Mangal R, Sharma A. Fabrication and characterization of porous poly (dimethylsiloxane)(PDMS) adhesives. ACS Applied Polymer Materials 2020;3:130–140.
2. Du W, Zhang Z, Fan W, Gao W, Su H, Li Z. Fabrication and evaluation of polydimethylsiloxane modified gelatin/silicone rubber asymmetric bilayer membrane with porous structure. Materials & Design 2018;158:28–38.
3. Menon A, Sreeram P, Vinod A, Naiker V, Nandana M, David DA, et al. Polyurethane (PU): Structure, properties, and applications.  Handbook of Thermosetting Foams, Aerogels, and Hydrogels: Elsevier; 2024. p. 67–92.
4. Yu Y, Xu G, Zhao P, Zhang J. Biocompatible, robust, waterproof and breathable PDMS-based PU fibrous membranes for potential application in wound dressing. Mater Today Commun 2024;38:107870.
5. Dos Santos MR, Alcaraz-Espinoza JJ, da Costa MM, de Oliveira HP. Usnic acid-loaded polyaniline/polyurethane foam wound dressing: preparation and bactericidal activity. Mater Sci Eng C 2018;89:33–40.
6. Usman A, Zia KM, Zuber M, Tabasum S, Rehman S, Zia F. Chitin and chitosan based polyurethanes: A review of recent advances and prospective biomedical applications. Int J Biol Macromol 2016;86:630–465.
7. Ramos R, Silva JP, Rodrigues AC, Costa R, Guardão L, Schmitt F, et al. Wound healing activity of the human antimicrobial peptide LL37. Peptides 2011;32:1469–1476.
8. Rashki S, Safardoust-Hojaghan H, Mirzaei H, Abdulsahib WK, Mahdi MA, Salavati-Niasari M, et al. Delivery LL37 by chitosan nanoparticles for enhanced antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy. Carbohydr Polym 2022;291:119634.
9. Lee SM, Park IK, Kim YS, Kim HJ, Moon H, Mueller S, et al. Physical, morphological, and wound healing properties of a polyurethane foam-film dressing. Biomater Res 2016;20:15.
10. Barrett S. Mepilex®> Ag: An antimicrobial, absorbent foam dressing with Safetac®> technology. Br J Nurs 2009;18:S28–S36.
11. Sales FC, Ariati RM, Noronha VT, Ribeiro JE. Mechanical characterization of PDMS with different mixing ratios. Procedia Struct Integr 2022;37:383–388.
12. White R. Evidence for atraumatic soft silicone wound dressing use. Wounds UK 2005;1:104–109.
13. Nussinovitch A, Gal A, Padula C, Santi P. Physical characterization of a new skin bioadhesive film. Aaps Pharmscitech 2008;9:458–463.
14. Yildirim A, Yilgor E, Yilgor I. Polyurethane synthesis revisited: Effect of solvent, stoichiometry, and temperature on the reaction of MDI with polyether glycols. Polymer 2025;326:128340.
15. Namviriyachote N, Lipipun V, Akkhawattanangkul Y, Charoonrut P, Ritthidej GC. Development of polyurethane foam dressing containing silver and asiaticoside for healing of dermal wound. Asian J Pharm Sci 2019;14:63–77.
16. Bužarovska A, Dinescu S, Lazar AD, Serban M, Pircalabioru GG, Costache M, et al. Nanocomposite foams based on flexible biobased thermoplastic polyurethane and ZnO nanoparticles as potential wound dressing materials. Mater Sci Eng C 2019;104:109893.
17. van Kooten TG, Whitesides JF, von Recum AF. Influence of silicone (PDMS) surface texture on human skin fibroblast proliferation as determined by cell cycle analysis. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;43:1–14.
18. Samavati SS, Kashanian S, Derakhshankhah H, Rabiei M, Sajadimajd S, Fakhri S, et al. Accelerated wound healing through tannin-rich Jaft extract, concentration-dependent efficacy and mechanistic insights from Quercus brantii ointment formulations. Sci Rep 2025;15:29004.
19.    Morena AG, Stefanov I, Ivanova K, Pérez-Rafael S, Sánchez-Soto M, Tzanov T. Antibacterial polyurethane foams with incorporated lignin-capped silver nanoparticles for chronic wound treatment. Ind Eng Chem Res 2020;59:4504–4514.
20. Chaerunnisa A, Madhuvu A, Najm D, Fooladi E, Team V. Effectiveness and safety of different dressing and securement methods for peripheral intravenous catheters: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int Wound J 2026;23:e70875.
21. Ho CY, Chou HY, Wang SH, Lan CY, Shyu VBH, Chen CH, et al. A comprehensive analysis of moist versus non‐moist dressings for split‐thickness skin graft donor sites: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Health Sci Rep 2025;8:e70315.
22. Bruckner‐Tuderman L, Mellerio J. Wound healing in epidermolysis bullosa. British J Dermatol 2017;177:e193–e195.
23. Vlassov S, Oras S, Antsov M, Sosnin I, Polyakov B, Shutka A, et al. Adhesion and mechanical properties of PDMS-based materials probed with AFM: A review. Rev Adv Mater Sci 2018;56:62–78.
24. Su L-Y, Yao M, Xu W, Zhong M, Cao Y, Zhou H. Cascade encapsulation of antimicrobial peptides, exosomes and antibiotics in fibrin-gel for first-aid hemostasis and infected wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol2024;269:132140.
25. Mohammadi A, Goneirani ZS, Fatahi A. A review on chitosan-containing polyurethanes: Synthesis, properties and applications. Iran J Polym Sci Technol  2023;36:3–22.
26. Sadeghi S, Bakhshandeh H, Ahangari Cohan R, Peirovi A, Ehsani P, Norouzian D. Synergistic anti-Staphylococcal activity of niosomal recombinant lysostaphin-LL-37. Int J Nanomedicine 2019:9777–9792.
27. Tokumaru S, Sayama K, Shirakata Y, Komatsuzawa H, Ouhara K, Hanakawa Y, et al. Induction of keratinocyte migration via transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor by the antimicrobial peptide LL-37. J Immunol 2005;175:4662–4668.
28.    Jastrzebska E, Zuchowska A, Flis S, Sokolowska P, Bulka M, Dybko A, et al. Biological characterization of the modified poly (dimethylsiloxane) surfaces based on cell attachment and toxicity assays. Biomicrofluidics 2018;12: 044105. 
29. Fahimirad S, Khaki M, Ghaznavi-Rad E, Abtahi H. Investigation of a novel bilayered PACL/PVA electrospun nanofiber incorporated Chitosan-LL37 and Chitosan-VEGF nanoparticles as an advanced antibacterial cell growth-promoting wound dressing. Int J Pharm 2024:124341.
30. Samavati SS, Kashanian S, Derakhshankhah H, Abuzade RA, Sajadimajd S, Rabiei M. Pcl and pcl-jaft nanofiber, synthesis, characterization, and histological comparison of the quality of wound healing. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2023;84:104457.
31. Park HJ, Cho DH, Kim HJ, Lee JY, Cho BK, Bang SI, et al. Collagen synthesis is suppressed in dermal fibroblasts by the human antimicrobial peptide LL-37. J Invest Dermatol 2009;129:843–850.
32. Dal Pra I, Petrini P, Charini A, Bozzini S, Farè S, Armato U. Silk fibroin-coated three-dimensional polyurethane scaffolds for tissue engineering: interactions with normal human fibroblasts. Tissue Eng 2003;9:1113–1121.
33. Esteban-Vives R, Young MT, Ziembicki J, Corcos A, Gerlach JC. Effects of wound dressings on cultured primary keratinocytes. Burns 2016;42:81–90.
34. Liang Y, Wang J, Liu X, Chen S, He G, Fang X, et al. Anti-adhesion multifunctional poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)/polydimethylsiloxane wound dressing for bacterial infection monitoring and photodynamic antimicrobial therapy. Int J Biol Macromol 2024;260:129501.
35. Chen B, He B, Tucker AM, Biluck I, Leung TH, Schaer TP, et al. An environmentally stable, biocompatible, and multilayered wound dressing film with reversible and strong adhesion. Adv Healthc Mater 2024:2400827.
36. Huang C, Wu Q, Li X, Pan P, Gu S, Tang T, et al. Silicone bioadhesive with shear-stiffening effect: Rate-responsive adhesion behavior and wound dressing application. Biomacromolecules 2024; 25:4510-4522.
Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 30 June 2026