Detection and discrimination of two Brucella species by multiplex real-time PCR and high-resolution melt analysis curve from human blood and comparison of results using RFLP

Piranfar, Vahhab; Sharif, Malike; Hashemi, Mojtaba; Vahdati, Ali Reza; Mirnejad, Reza

doi:10.22038/ijbms.2015.5214

Detection and discrimination of two Brucella species by multiplex real-time PCR and high-resolution melt analysis curve from human blood and comparison of results using RFLP

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ Department of Biology, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University of Tonekabon, Tonekabon, Iran

² Department of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

³ Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

⁴ Molecular Biology Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

10.22038/ijbms.2015.5214

Abstract

Objective(s): Rapid and accurate detection of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis from clinical samples is so important because antibiotic treatment has major side effects. This study reveals a new method in detection of clinical samples of brucellosis using real-time PCR and high-resolution melt (HRM) curve analysis.
Materials and Methods: 160 brucellosis suspicious samples with more than 1/80 serum antibody titers were collected and the results were compared with the RFLP method. In order to amplify the sequences for HRM analysis, vdcc, int-hyp and glk and for RFLP, omp2a and omp2b with PstI and Hinf1 restriction endonuclease were used. At last, the accuracy and specificity of the two methods were compared with each other.
Results: Out of these 160 samples, multiplex real time PCR showed 108 positive samples (67.5%), including 56% B. melitensis and 44% B. abortus; whereas in PCR-RFLP 52 out of 160 samples were positive, where recognition of two species were accordant with HRM analysis, separation was based on the size of the amplified fragment. Using the designed primers and performing the assay, we confirmed this method to be much faster and have lower cost with more than 99% accuracy compared to methods such as RFLP.
Conclusion: The present study showed that this technique, which scans gene segments and creates an analysis pattern for detection of clinical samples, is useful and more dominant compared with PCR-RFLP. Thus, this method can be used for brucellosis detection, and clinical and epidemiological research.

Keywords

References

1. Tiller RV, Gee JE, Frace MA, Taylor TK, Setubal JC, Hoffmaster AR, et al. Characterization of novel brucella strains originating from wild native rodent species in north queensland, Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010; 76:5837-5845.

2.Eisenberg T, Hamann H-P, Kaim U, Schlez K, Seeger H, Schauerte N, et al. Isolation of potentially novel brucella spp. from Frogs. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78:3753-3755.

3. Mirnejad R, Doust RH, Kachuei R, Mortazavi SM, Khoobdel M, Ahamadi A. Simultaneous detection and differentiates of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis by combinatorial PCR. Asian Pac J Trop 2012; 5:24-28.

4.Meisel S, Stöckel S, Elschner M, Melzer F, Rösch P, Popp J. Raman spectroscopy as a potential tool for detection of brucella spp. in Milk. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78:5575-5583.

5.Yagupsky P, Baron EJ. Laboratory exposures to brucellae and implications for bioterrorism. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11:1180-1185.

6.Yagupsky P. Detection of Brucellae in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37:3437-3442.

7. Al Dahouk S, Scholz HC, Tomaso H, Bahn P, Gollner C, Karges W, et al. Differential phenotyping of Brucella species using a newly developed semi-automated metabolic system. BMC Microbiol 2010; 10:269.

8.Schofield DA, Sharp NJ, Westwater C. Phage-based platforms for the clinical detection of human bacterial pathogens. Bacteriophage 2012; 2:105-283.

9.Godfroid J, Nielsen K, Saegerman C. Diagnosis of brucellosis in livestock and wildlife. Croat Med J
2010; 51:296-305.

10. Foster J, Price L, Beckstrom-Sternberg S, Pearson T, Brown W, Kiesling D, et al. Genotyping of Brucella species using clade specific SNPs. BMC Microbiol 2012; 12:110.

11. Gopaul KK, Koylass MS, Smith CJ, Whatmore AM. Rapid identification of Brucella isolates to the species level by real time PCR based single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis. BMC Microbiol 2008; 8:86.

12. Wattiau P, Whatmore AM, Van Hessche M, Godfroid J, Fretin D. Nucleotide polymorphism-based single-tube test for robust molecular identification of all currently described brucella species. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011; 77:6674-6679.

13. Higgins J, Stuber T, Quance C, Edwards WH, Tiller RV, Linfield T, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Brucella abortus isolates from cattle, elk, and bison in the United States. 1998 to 2011. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78:3674-3684.

14. Winchell JM, Wolff BJ, Tiller R, Bowen MD, Hoffmaster AR. Rapid identification and discrimination of Brucella isolates by use of real-time PCR and high-resolution melt analysis. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48:697-702.

15. Zeinzinger J, Pietzka AT, Stöger A, Kornschober C, Kunert R, Allerberger F, et al. One-step triplex Hhgh-resolution melting analysis for rapid identification and simultaneous subtyping of frequently isolated salmonella serovars. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78:3352-3360.

16. White H, Potts G. Mutation scanning by high resolution melt analysis: evaluation of RotorGene 6000™ (Corbett Life Science), HR1™,and 384 well LightScanner™ (Idaho Technology). National Genetics Reference Laboratory, Wessex, United Kingdom: 2006.

17. Mirnejad R, Mohammadi M, Majdi A, Taghizoghi N, Piranfar V. Molecular typing of Brucella melitensis and B. abortus from human blood samples using PCR-RFLP Method. Jundishapur J Microbiol 2013; 6:e7197.

18. Cloeckaert A, Verger JM, Grayon M, Grepinet O. Restriction site polymorphism of the genes encoding the major 25 kDa and 36 kDa outer-membrane proteins of Brucella. Microbiol 1995; 141:2111-2121.

19. Lopez-Goni I, Garcia-Yoldi D, Marin CM, de Miguel MJ, Munoz PM, Blasco JM, et al. Evaluation of a multiplex PCR assay (Bruce-ladder) for molecular typing of all Brucella species, including the vaccine strains. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46:3484-3487.

20. Merchant-Patel S, Blackall PJ, Templeton J, Price EP, Tong SYC, Huygens F, et al. Campylobacter jejuni and campylobacter coli genotyping by high-resolution melting analysis of a flaA fragment. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010; 76:493-499.

21. Li W, Raoult D, Fournier P-E. Bacterial strain typing in the genomic era. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2009; 33:892-916.